SSCG(3)：Finitely Big Numbers Name
Finitely Big Numbers Name
SSCG(3)isnotonlylargerthanTREE(3),itismuch,muchlargerthan.TREE(TREE(…TREE(3)…))wherethetotalnestingdepthoftheformulaisTREE(3)levelsof ...。其他文章還包含有：「拉約數」、「Friedman'sSSCGfunction」、「世界上最大的数和最小的数是多少？」、「SSCG(3)」、「Subcubicgraphnumber」、「葛立恒数、TREE（3）」、「LookingtogetahandleonSSCG(3)(whichismuch」、「SSCG(3)」、「IfGraham'snumberisthesizeofaq...
查看更多 離開網站
拉約數
https://zh.wikipedia.org
這個數在當時比其他任何數都來得大（後來出現一個叫做BIG FOOT的大數比它更大），就算是葛立恆數，跟拉約數比起來也是微不足道的。 ... 這個數是在麻省理工學院在2007年1月26 ...
Friedman's SSCG function
https://en.wikipedia.org
SSCG(3) is much larger than both TREE(3) and TREETREE(3)(3), that is, the TREE function nested TREE(3) times with 3 at the bottom. Adam P. Goucher claims ...
世界上最大的数和最小的数是多少？
https://www.163.com
SCG是与SSCG相近的函数，其增长速度还要更快，SCG(3)还要大于SSCG(3)。 最小的数. 如果要说数学中最小的数，可以在给SCG(3)加个负号，-SCG(3) ...
SSCG(3)
https://www.youtube.com
Subcubic graph number
https://googology.fandom.com
One output of the sequence, SCG(13), is a subject of extensive research. It is known to surpass TREE(3), a number that arises from a related sequence.
葛立恒数、TREE（3）
https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com
沒有這個頁面的資訊。
Looking to get a handle on SSCG(3) (which is much
https://math.stackexchange.com
SSCG(3) is claimed to be larger than TREE(TREE(...(TREE(3))...)) for some very large number of nested TREE operations, but I have no clue how ...
SSCG(3)
https://huge-numbers.fandom.co
SSCG(3) is a big number its bigger than G64, TREE(3), TREE(...(...3...)3), or even GGGGG(TREE(3))GGGGGTREE(.....(.....(......(3)..) the SSCG(n) function ...
If Graham's number is the size of a quark
https://www.quora.com
100 isn't 'bigger' than 3, it's just larger in magnitude. Huge numbers like Graham's and SSCG are inconceivably large - but not big in size, ...