SSO vs VOO：VOO vs SSO
VOO vs SSO
2023年8月14日—IfoundVOOandinvestedverylittlesofarbutthensomeoneclosetomesuggestedSSO.SSOdoesn'tlookgoodinlongtermasperitspast ...。其他文章還包含有：「IsThatLeveragedETFWorthIt?ComparingSSOandVOO」、「SPY與兩倍槓桿SSO歷史回測比較與分析」、「SSOETF介紹：長期持有？複委託？兩倍做多標普」、「SSOvs.VOO—ETFcomparisontool」、「VOOvsSSO」、「市場長期上漲，長抱2倍槓桿ETF賺更多？以美股ETFVOO」、「槓桿ET...
查看更多 離開網站
Is That Leveraged ETF Worth It? Comparing SSO and VOO
https://www.advisorperspective
SSO has had a Sharpe Ratio of 1.13 while VOO has had a Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. SOO has also had a lower Treynor Ratio than VOO (14.9 vs 16.69).
SPY與兩倍槓桿SSO歷史回測比較與分析
https://stockaball.com
而兩倍SPY的槓桿ETF像是SSO（0.89%/年）、SPUU（0.75%/年）. 多了差不多8-10倍的內扣費用. 1000萬的資產投資SPY，一年差不多扣9000元，而SSO扣了8 ...
SSO ETF介紹：長期持有？複委託？兩倍做多標普
https://finesttracker.com
SSO VS SPY 比較; 槓桿ETF 的特性; SSO ETF 管理費用; SSO 成分股持股 ... 的ETF，甚至是使用複委託來投資海外股票，如VT、VOO 等，我們都需要去「證券商」來開戶。
SSO vs. VOO — ETF comparison tool
https://portfolioslab.com
Over the past 10 years, SSO has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 19.72%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.63% annualized return. The ...
VOO vs SSO
https://www.askfinny.com
Both SSO and VOO are ETFs. SSO has a higher 5-year return than VOO (14.57% vs 11.43%). SSO has a higher expense ratio than VOO (0.89% vs 0.03%).
市場長期上漲，長抱2倍槓桿ETF賺更多？以美股ETF VOO
https://wealth.businessweekly.
槓桿ETF長期持有？最佳槓桿比率
https://vocus.cc
在過去十年長期持有原型為市值型的槓桿ETF，像是S&P 500指數兩倍槓桿的SSO、三倍槓桿的UPRO，都能輕鬆打敗指數和勝過一倍的原型ETF（VOO、SPY）。
長抱2倍槓桿ETF賺更多？以美股ETF VOO、SSO為例：時間愈 ...
https://today.line.me
理論來看，費用高長期投資不划算，既然2倍槓桿的SSO有這麼高的內扣費用，到底實際能不能比VOO獲得更好報酬呢？今天就來比較看看。