travelers loss ratio:Travelers sees Q2 net income soar to $534m despite ...
Travelers sees Q2 net income soar to $534m despite ...
21小時前—TheTravelersCompanies,Inc.hasreportedanetincomeof$534millionforQ2of2024despiteanunderwritinglossof$65milliondrivenby ...。其他文章還包含有:「TravelersReportsExcellentFirstQuarterResults」、「TravelersReportsExcellentFourthQuarter2023Results」、「TravelersReportsStrongSecondQuarterandYear」、「TravelersReversesQ2IncomeLoss」、「Travelers'stockdivesasrevenuemisses」、「Travelerspro...
查看更多 離開網站Travelers Reports Excellent First Quarter Results
https://investor.travelers.com
The underlying combined ratio improved 2.9 points to an outstanding 87.7%, driven by strong underlying results in each of our three segments.
Travelers Reports Excellent Fourth Quarter 2023 Results
https://investor.travelers.com
The underlying combined ratio of 85.9% improved 10.3 points, reflecting improvement in both Homeowners and Other and Automobile. Net favorable ...
Travelers Reports Strong Second Quarter and Year
https://www.morningstar.com
The combined ratio of 97.1% improved 4.0 points due to an improvement in the underlying combined ratio (3.1 points), higher net favorable prior ...
Travelers Reverses Q2 Income Loss
https://www.insurancejournal.c
The second quarter combined ratio for Travelers' personal lines business was 108.5—a better result than the 122 recorded in Q2 2023. Net ...
Travelers' stock dives as revenue misses
https://www.marketwatch.com
Combined ratio improves and beat estimates but stays above 100% as catastrophe losses weigh. Travelers' stock rallies as profit beats by wide ...
Travelers profit misses estimates on hit from catastrophe ...
https://www.reuters.com
A ratio below 100% means the insurer earned more in premiums than it paid out in claims. As of Tuesday's close, Travelers' shares had gained 17% ...
Travelers' Q4 Net Income Skyrockets as Personal Lines ...
https://www.insurancejournal.c
The combined ratio for the year was a near-identical 104.8 in personal lines, with an income loss of $128 million. Was this article valuable?