travelers loss ratio:Travelers' stock dives as revenue misses
Travelers' stock dives as revenue misses
22小時前—Combinedratioimprovesandbeatestimatesbutstaysabove100%ascatastrophelossesweigh.Travelers'stockralliesasprofitbeatsbywide ...。其他文章還包含有:「TravelersReportsExcellentFirstQuarterResults」、「TravelersReportsExcellentFourthQuarter2023Results」、「TravelersReportsStrongSecondQuarterandYear」、「TravelersseesQ2netincomesoarto$534mdespite...」、「TravelersReversesQ2IncomeLoss」、「Tr...
查看更多 離開網站Travelers Reports Excellent First Quarter Results
https://investor.travelers.com
The underlying combined ratio improved 2.9 points to an outstanding 87.7%, driven by strong underlying results in each of our three segments.
Travelers Reports Excellent Fourth Quarter 2023 Results
https://investor.travelers.com
The underlying combined ratio of 85.9% improved 10.3 points, reflecting improvement in both Homeowners and Other and Automobile. Net favorable ...
Travelers Reports Strong Second Quarter and Year
https://www.morningstar.com
The combined ratio of 97.1% improved 4.0 points due to an improvement in the underlying combined ratio (3.1 points), higher net favorable prior ...
Travelers sees Q2 net income soar to $534m despite ...
https://www.reinsurancene.ws
The Travelers Companies, Inc. has reported a net income of $534 million for Q2 of 2024 despite an underwriting loss of $65 million driven by ...
Travelers Reverses Q2 Income Loss
https://www.insurancejournal.c
The second quarter combined ratio for Travelers' personal lines business was 108.5—a better result than the 122 recorded in Q2 2023. Net ...
Travelers profit misses estimates on hit from catastrophe ...
https://www.reuters.com
A ratio below 100% means the insurer earned more in premiums than it paid out in claims. As of Tuesday's close, Travelers' shares had gained 17% ...
Travelers' Q4 Net Income Skyrockets as Personal Lines ...
https://www.insurancejournal.c
The combined ratio for the year was a near-identical 104.8 in personal lines, with an income loss of $128 million. Was this article valuable?