SPUU vs SSO：SPUU vs. SSO — ETF comparison tool
SPUU vs. SSO — ETF comparison tool
Overthepast10years,SPUUhasunderperformedSSOwithanannualizedreturnof17.64%,whileSSOhasyieldedacomparativelyhigher19.07%annualizedreturn.。其他文章還包含有：「BattleRoyaleSSOvsSPUUandSPXLvsUPRO」、「SPUUvsSSO」、「SPUUvsSSO」、「SpuuvsSSO」、「SPY與兩倍槓桿SSO歷史回測比較與分析」、「SSOvs.SPUUETFComparisonAnalysis」、「TopLeveragedS&P500ETFs」、「有沒有開槓桿報酬會差很多嗎？達人：用2檔美股ETF找...
查看更多 離開網站
Battle Royale SSO vs SPUU and SPXL vs UPRO
https://www.youtube.com
SPUU vs SSO
https://www.askfinny.com
Both SPUU and SSO are ETFs. SPUU has a higher 5-year return than SSO (14.51% vs 13.8%). SPUU has a lower expense ratio than SSO (0.64% vs 0.89%).
SPUU vs SSO
https://minafi.com
For these two funds, SPUU has an expense ratio of 0.64% while SSO has an expense ratio of 0.90%. In this case, both of these funds have a similar fee. Winner: $ ...
Spuu vs SSO
https://www.reddit.com
Spuu pays out the gains via unqualified dividends whereas sso does not. They have different leverage methods.
SPY與兩倍槓桿SSO歷史回測比較與分析
https://stockaball.com
而兩倍SPY的槓桿ETF像是SSO（0.89%/年）、SPUU（0.75%/年）. 多了差不多8-10倍的內扣費用. 1000萬的資產投資SPY，一年差不多扣9000元，而SSO扣了8 ...
SSO vs. SPUU ETF Comparison Analysis
https://www.etf.com
Compare ETFs SSO and SPUU on performance, AUM, flows, holdings, costs and ESG ratings.
Top Leveraged S&P 500 ETFs
https://www.investopedia.com
SPUU and SSO have the lowest cost and most liquidity for twice leveraged, while UPRO and SPXL are the least expensive and had the most liquidity for triple ...
有沒有開槓桿報酬會差很多嗎？達人：用2檔美股ETF找答案 ...
https://smart.businessweekly.c
1,000萬的資產投資SPY，一年差不多扣9,000元，而SSO扣了8萬9,000元，SPUU扣了7萬5,000元。投資最重要的就是成本了，多花費的錢就等於少賺的錢，那2倍槓桿 ...