SPUU vs SSO:有沒有開槓桿報酬會差很多嗎?達人:用2檔美股ETF找答案 ...

有沒有開槓桿報酬會差很多嗎?達人:用2檔美股ETF找答案 ...

有沒有開槓桿報酬會差很多嗎?達人:用2檔美股ETF找答案 ...

2022年12月20日—1,000萬的資產投資SPY,一年差不多扣9,000元,而SSO扣了8萬9,000元,SPUU扣了7萬5,000元。投資最重要的就是成本了,多花費的錢就等於少賺的錢,那2倍槓桿 ...。其他文章還包含有:「BattleRoyaleSSOvsSPUUandSPXLvsUPRO」、「SPUUvsSSO」、「SPUUvsSSO」、「SpuuvsSSO」、「SPUUvs.SSO—ETFcomparisontool」、「SPY與兩倍槓桿SSO歷史回測比較與分析」、「SSOvs.SPUUETFComparisonAnalysis」、「TopLeveragedS&P5...

查看更多 離開網站

Provide From Google
Battle Royale SSO vs SPUU and SPXL vs UPRO
Battle Royale SSO vs SPUU and SPXL vs UPRO

https://www.youtube.com

Provide From Google
SPUU vs SSO
SPUU vs SSO

https://www.askfinny.com

Both SPUU and SSO are ETFs. SPUU has a higher 5-year return than SSO (14.51% vs 13.8%). SPUU has a lower expense ratio than SSO (0.64% vs 0.89%).

Provide From Google
SPUU vs SSO
SPUU vs SSO

https://minafi.com

For these two funds, SPUU has an expense ratio of 0.64% while SSO has an expense ratio of 0.90%. In this case, both of these funds have a similar fee. Winner: $ ...

Provide From Google
Spuu vs SSO
Spuu vs SSO

https://www.reddit.com

Spuu pays out the gains via unqualified dividends whereas sso does not. They have different leverage methods.

Provide From Google
SPUU vs. SSO — ETF comparison tool
SPUU vs. SSO — ETF comparison tool

https://portfolioslab.com

Over the past 10 years, SPUU has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 17.64%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.07% annualized return.

Provide From Google
SPY與兩倍槓桿SSO歷史回測比較與分析
SPY與兩倍槓桿SSO歷史回測比較與分析

https://stockaball.com

而兩倍SPY的槓桿ETF像是SSO(0.89%/年)、SPUU(0.75%/年). 多了差不多8-10倍的內扣費用. 1000萬的資產投資SPY,一年差不多扣9000元,而SSO扣了8 ...

Provide From Google
SSO vs. SPUU ETF Comparison Analysis
SSO vs. SPUU ETF Comparison Analysis

https://www.etf.com

Compare ETFs SSO and SPUU on performance, AUM, flows, holdings, costs and ESG ratings.

Provide From Google
Top Leveraged S&P 500 ETFs
Top Leveraged S&P 500 ETFs

https://www.investopedia.com

SPUU and SSO have the lowest cost and most liquidity for twice leveraged, while UPRO and SPXL are the least expensive and had the most liquidity for triple ...